During intermission, A-1 is charged with a technical foul. What is the consequence for the head coach?

When a player is charged with a technical foul during an intermission, it has specific implications for the head coach. In this scenario, an indirect technical foul is assessed to the head coach when a player is penalized for a technical foul. This means that although the player is the one who committed the infraction, it reflects on the team's coaching staff and program.

The reasoning behind this rule is grounded in accountability; a technical foul on a player may indicate a lack of discipline or control, which the coach is expected to manage. Therefore, penalizing the head coach indirectly serves as a reminder of their responsibility for the conduct of their players.

Consequently, this rule highlights the importance of maintaining composure and discipline both on and off the court, reinforcing the role of the coach in guiding their players' behavior during the game.